The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Earther[edit]

Earther (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 18:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, strongly. Widely cited environmental news source with original reporting.The lorax (talk) 19:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  The lorax, Article fails to prove notability, but i'll take this as a point that I made a mistake. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.