The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Dreams[edit]

Earth Dreams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BK redirect to Janet Morris reverted hence this AFD. -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 00:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as recommended with previous titles in series. Article needs more data added, but is relevant. I will try to add some and to advise page starter.Mzmadmike (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Google Book search for "Earth Dreams" janet morris gives multiple hits. The book has been mentioned in other sources. The article just needs proper references added (and expansion into being more than a blurb). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Google Books turns up what looks like a number of reviews. Qrsdogg (talk) 20:12, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article has room for improvement, as Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus stated. Give it time. Luke Jaywalker (talk) 00:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep Notable book based on reviews, one written about one of the books in this 3-book series by the very person calling for deletion. Notable sci-fi, fantasy and non-fiction author. Admin requesting deletion has not specified an argument for why he thinks the book non-notable, which is insufficient according to WP guidelines. Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions Yes its a stub. Yes it needs more attention.Cthu-Lou (talk) 01:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC) — Cthu-Lou (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Strong Keep As mentioned above multiple reviews and other mentions found in Google Books, including reviews in Analog Science Fiction/Science Fact Jacob and Apple's "The Annotated Guide to Sequels" and Kirkus Reviews. ColdServings talk 04:00 7 May 2011 (UTC)— ColdServings (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.