The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:24, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EarthBrowser[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability or significant coverage since 2010. Article also lacks sources and paragraphs. I tried looking for anything about EarthBrowser, but nothing showed besides download sites. Analog Horror, (Speak) 17:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:57, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There are many results on Google scholar. It needs citations added but it is notable.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 18:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Asserting that sources exist is unconvincing. You need to link to those sources so we can assess them. That is, link to sources that actually discuss the subject in detail, not just to a search engine result list. SpinningSpark 10:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to have some significance in the history of virtual globes. It's covered in Virtual Globes: An Overview of Their History, Uses, and Future Challenges which gives some of the history (not in our article) of the development (Matt Giger, 1996). The NASA technical report The Role of Virtual Globes in Geoscience gives it a few sentences and confirms the pioneering nature of the development. Note that the original weblink at earthbrowser.com has been hijacked by malware so don't click on it – I'll remove it from the article. SpinningSpark 11:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.