The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EX600[edit]

EX600 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A specification sheet for a specific model of laptop. No indication that the product is notable other than being "light and also financial attractive", no sources. Wikipedia is not a manual or brochure. Kateshortforbob 23:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ETA Prod contested by creator, which is why it's here. --Kateshortforbob 23:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete. This isn't even an article. Ford MF (talk) 00:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Agree to both the people above. This is just random info. It isn't an article. Ohmpandya (Talk) 02:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I considered placing a speedy deletion tag, but couldn't find appropriate criteria, except perhaps G11 blatant advertising. (I didn't think it fitted under any article categories listed in A7 unnotable?) --Kateshortforbob 02:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• It might meet A1. No context - but is it a "very short article"? Certainly it provides little to no context. And there is also WP:SNOW. Delete anyway.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 12:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. An individual model of laptop is not inherently notable, and no evidence otherwise is provided in the article. Someguy1221 (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.