This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:10, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

EScare[edit]

Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Reason given was "not noteable, no uses of term by others, better to add to McCarthyism page". Neologism, POV original research. — Gwalla | Talk 20:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, sounds an awful lot like original research/neologism to me. --Alan Au 20:52, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, neology... Spearhead 21:10, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not a personal essay, a personal paragraph... humblefool® 21:12, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no references presented. The link takes to a CMS site. Possibly POV, advertisement or original research.-Poli (talk • contribs) 22:36, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.