The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, criterion A7. The article was lacking in any claim of the subject's significance or importance. —C.Fred (talk) 05:27, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dustin Harlowe[edit]

Dustin Harlowe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO. reddogsix (talk) 04:56, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – aside from what the nominator says, the article is written like an advertisement promoting the individual. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 04:58, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, non-notable, no claims of notability. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's a shame we even have to take this to AfD. No real credible claim of notability in this autobiographical spamvertisement. Google isn't showing notability either.--Fabrictramp(public) (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.