The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Philippe 19:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nomination (I have no opinion). This was nominated for CSD under criterion A7. Keilana|Parlez ici 06:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep A few notable bands seem to be linked to this label. Lugnuts (talk) 08:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. This article, and the articles of many of the bands, rely on primary sources for their references (situation is the same on the Norwegian wikipedia so no sources add from the articles there). One article that does cite sources is Hurra Torpedo, a band that seems to be notable (it was missing from the label article but linked on some of the related articles, so I have added it). However only one notable band is not enough, and the label does not seem to meet the WP:N or WP:CORP notability guidelines due to lack of coverage in reliable sources so unless more references are added to establish notability of the label and/or other bands associated with the label, it should be deleted. --Snigbrook(talk) 21:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero third party sources...or any sources for that matter. Fails notabilty. — BQZip01 —talk 05:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.