The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:GNG has been demonstrated. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:31, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dude Wipes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still a somewhat newly started company with my searches finding only expected coverage especially since they are so far best known for Shark Tank, see this (fades by the next few pages) and also this so this is still questionable for the actual solid notability for Wikipedia. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – A comfortable WP:GNG pass. Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. See also WP:NTEMP. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 16:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because notability has been demonstrated according to GNG. However, I don't really understand the nomination (is it even seeking deletion?). If it is raising a valid issue I am unable to refute any such claim. Thincat (talk) 22:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The sources cited by Northamerica demonstrate that this topic passes WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 06:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.