- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Mario franchise characters#Recurring enemies. RL0919 (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Dry Bones (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A WP:BEFORE found nothing notable about the Dry Bones enemy that merits a separate page. Unreferenced and fancrufty. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect or Delete - minor fictional character with no independent notability. Very little content to warrant splitting from any number of Super Mario related articles. Fails the WP:GNG. Sergecross73 msg me 02:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Restore redirect made by @Utopes:. ミラP 03:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ミラP 03:40, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect back to List of Mario franchise characters#Recurring enemies as stated by Miraclepine. Dekimasuよ! 05:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the list of Mario franchise characters. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 21:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the list of Mario franchise characters per Miraclepine. Aoba47 (talk) 03:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect please. Frankly, the article should have been reverted back to a redirect rather than bringing it to AfD in my opinion, but a fair discussion could still be warranted, so I get why this was brought up. Didn't even realize that an article had been created from the redirect. Utopes (talk) 02:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is he considered not relevant enough to have his own page, but Birdo, Rosalina, Boo, Chain Chomp etc. are relevant enough to have their own page? Aquatic Ambiance (talk) 08:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not about whether he is "considered relevant" but whether there are sufficient sources to prove he is notable. RELIABLE sources.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.