The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW as wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Davewild (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Driveway Pong[edit]

Per WP:NFT. Was de-prodded by an IP. Fraud ^{talk to me} 06:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the very definition of WP:NFT --Closedmouth (talk) 06:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 06:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pour down the drain. Yep, NFT. There isn't really any explicit claim here that anybody but its creators have played this game. Zetawoof_(ζ) 06:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but consider content merge into WP:SILLY if it were still accepting new material. Jclemens (talk) 08:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — per WP:NFT. macy^talk 12:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Utter nonsense. WWGB (talk) 13:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete stupid. JuJube (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: I would suggest just a plain delete on the basis of WP:NOT#HOWTO unless this could be fixed, but I am upping it to speedy because it is a description of the works of non-notable people who are named by first-name only. Hellno2 (talk) 14:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, made up one day, and is a a how-to guide to play this non-notable recently madeup game. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 16:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.