The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DriveOK Inc[edit]

DriveOK Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable corporation or firm (A7) and borderline advertising (G11). I previously speedy deleted this article, but the author requested recreation and said would provide links to external news articles proving notability. However, the links to the news articles are not impressive and show only a shallow coverage of the subject by two minor media outlets and one blog; the other links are to self promotional materials. When this lack of notability is combined with the advertising issue, this article should be deleted. Alabamaboy 14:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above.--Alabamaboy 14:39, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per ad. Onnaghar ^{talk ! ctrb} 16:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 10:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable company. Keb25 11:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Has two cites, one of which is a dead link, and the other vaguely about the product, not the company. I'll change my mind if somebody else fixes this mess. Bearian 20:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - There are 6 non dead external links and 2 non dead reference links. Also, if this article is to be deleted because it links to the website for the company then everyone one of the articles under fast food chicken chains have to go because most of them do not even have links to articles written about them just links to their websites showing their pricing and menus. Nomad1000 15:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.