The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drink me magazine[edit]

Drink me magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No notability established. At this point, notability would be almost impossible to establish, as the magazine's first issue isn't due out until August. Since it's not yet released, this article is almost certainly created by someone closely connected to the magazine, which leads to concerns of conflict of interest and using Wikipedia for advertising. The article also violates Wikipedia's policy regarding crystal ball information. While it may warrant an article in the future, if it becomes a successful and notable magazine, it does not meet the criteria for inclusion at this time. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was about to nominate it myself (when I found a {prod} tag had already been removed), as it fails both WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. Shawisland (talk) 22:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Likely WP:COI, it fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:ADVERT, possible use of Wikipedia as their free web host. It also fails WP:N as well. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 23:32, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL, and if it gets more notability in the future, it can be recreated, but now it does not.--SRX^--LatinoHeat 00:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. Artene50 (talk) 01:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - does not claim to be notable --T-rex 02:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ukexpat (talk) 02:58, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I prod-ed it, and I still think it should be deleted. My rationale on the PROD still holds true here. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Save Although it look slike this magazine doesnt exisit, i did a little research and found out that as an organization, it already exists. They seemed to through some launch party in California and it looks like the have a large following on facebook and within the San Francisco night life. Although perhaps a little premature, it seems to me to be a formidable and worthy entry.randorambo — randorambo (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

That doesn't meet WP:N. A "following on facebook"? The launch party in California does nothing for its notability. Are there any reliable, independent sources? Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 15:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.