The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 21:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. There are two entries that meet WP:DABMENTION. This could be resolved with a redirect and a hatnote, but I have no sense of which of these would be primary. bd2412T 17:02, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't see any reason to delete it now that it's been cleaned up :) Lonehexagon (talk) 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.