The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here's all the coverage I dug up that feels noteworthy, and I'm not feeling much here: [1][2][3][4][5] I vote weak delete. Raymie (t • c) 00:21, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it seems promotional, was created by a single user probably for the sake of advertising the hotel, and most importantly there's nothing notable about it. Adamant1 (talk) 13:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.