The result of the debate was delete. Verification is non-negotiable. There appears to be some confusion in this debate: While the term dominionist may or may not be in common parlance, the question here is its association with the parties listed on the page.
brenneman{L} 03:31, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This list was created to push a biased POV. I could argue that none of the parties listed should be considered "dominionist". At the least this epithet needs some real proof. None was provided. GUÐSÞEGN – UTEX – 20:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]