The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dokkio[edit]

Dokkio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable corpcruft, and this is reflected in the sourcing.

1. [1] does not mention the company or the assertion that a particular individual was employed;
2. [2] Primary source, just a directory listing;
3. [3] Primary source; does not support the assertion made (lists individuals with no context...which it cannot provide, being, again, no more than a directory listing);
4. [4] WP:NOTDIRECTORY/ WP:NOTYELLOW apply; and
5. [5] Sef-sourced to an advertising page.
   There is no further sourcing available in either news outlets or the literature. All commentary comprises passing mentions and listings, with no coverage in third party, independent reliable sourcing. ——SerialNumber54129 08:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC) ——SerialNumber54129 08:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ——SerialNumber54129 08:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ——SerialNumber54129 08:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ——SerialNumber54129 08:06, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - does not meet WP:ORGCRIT: no significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources - Epinoia (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this kamikaze curated promotional text. Could possibly make it as a brochure but not of our concern. -The Gnome (talk) 10:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.