The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discode[edit]

Discode (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nomination, PROD removed by an anonymous user without a rationale. The article was originally PRODed as it appears to be about a non-notable short anime series. Bettia (rawr!) 15:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no sources cited, fails WP:V. Stifle (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per my original prod. No evidence that subject satisfies the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. --Farix (Talk) 21:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I thought we had long ago established that adaptations make for notability. This began its life as a game and was adapted into an OVA series. 208.245.87.2 (talk) 15:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment From WP:BK The book has been made or adapted with attribution into a motion picture that was released into multiple commercial theaters, or was aired on a nationally televised network or cable station in any country. For one, this is a game adaptations so this criteria from WP:BK wouldn't apply. Moreover, being adapted into an OVA wouldn't fulfill the criteria either. --Farix (Talk) 22:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.