The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:37, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diinoh[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NSINGER nor WP:GNG. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 12:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 12:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 12:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I was unable to find any sourcing to help this pass WP:GNG. Missvain (talk) 20:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, this qualifies for WP:A7 and WP:G11. Furthermore sources in the article aren’t about the subject. -Xclusivzik (talk) 23:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not A7 ("Diinoh is often referred to as the "king of HipHop" genre" is an assertion of significance), it doesn't rise up to G11 (unless G3), it may qualify for WP:G3 (as a hoax, if this is a hoax, it doesn't appear to pan out when examining/searching for sources - however this isn't obvious from the text itself).--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 05:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
...Notice how each and every phrase/text in the article is identical to Kabza De Small, not to mention the sources. -Xclusivzik (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.