The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted, obvious advertising and unreadable gibberish. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Plasticity[edit]

Digital Plasticity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay with no reputable sources. The article claims that a book on the topic is being written, but that doesn't establish notability. Looie496 (talk) 00:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete, another seemingly identical vertical may yield results never before imagined unreadable spam for something only the author cares about. Miami33139 (talk) 01:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as spam (G11). So tagged. Major crystalspammery talking about a book that hasn't been completed, published, let alone released. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Spam Spam wonderful Spam, WP:Advertising ham and bacon. --WngLdr34 (talk) 13:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.