The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dialpad[edit]

Dialpad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This specific product is not notable on its own. The references and material in the article only refer to usual announcements about funding and product launches. A search of online sources about it doesn't yield much to establish notability either. TushiTalk To Me 07:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- all the references given lead to no reliable sources to support notability of the subject. Wikipedia depends on reliable sources and this article has none of that. A search online doesn't yield much to save this article too. Bilbo Baggins (talk) 10:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- "minor-tech-startup" spam, aka WP:TOOSOON, and nothing else. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No specific coverage from reliable, secondary sources - fails the WP:GNG. TheMagikCow (talk) 10:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - doesn't pass WP:GNG from the sources I could find online. Xaxing (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.