The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Band appears non-notable per the criteria—αlεx•mullεr 18:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable subject, advertisement with no independent reliable sources. Ism schism (talk) 05:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I fixed the PRI link so the article is no longer completely without reliable sources. I created this article after listening to the PRI segment about them, and I thought it would be good to have an article; I based it almost completely on the NPR report. They get quite a few Google hits, but there's admittedly not a whole lot of news coverage on them. --TexasDex★ 06:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -RiverHockey (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Master of PuppetsCall me MoP!☺ 17:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable--Hazillow (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.