The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 03:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Its simply promotional, hence deserve no place on wikipedia.--Mahensingha(Talk)"Thanx n Regards" 15:50, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Possible WP:CSD G11 candidate as a spam article. No secondary sources to indicate notability either. Aerospeed (Talk) 03:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.