The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No embassies, no historic ties, on opposite sides of the world - the usual trivial bilateral relationship. BiruitorulTalk 15:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a policy or guideline for "Relations of X and Y" is very much needed. There is no evidence here of any relations between the countries at all. JJL (talk) 15:40, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another laughable random combination with no evidence of relations. non resident ambassadors. LibStar (talk) 00:15, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.