The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delhi Belgian Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are mostly tangential mentions/incidental coverage. Dubious notability, minimal sourcing, ad-like. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional keep - If people can take the time to eliminate the one-sentence paragraphs and eliminate the ad-like tendencies of this article, this article could help to be a notable link to the community's Belgian ancestors. GVnayR (talk) 04:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have already started on the path to making the article less ad-like. Maybe people should find additional references about the Delhi Belgian Club in print form to make it even more notable. GVnayR (talk) 04:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A small club in a town of 4,000 people in rural Ontario does not meet any notability criteria whatsoever.Agent 86 (talk) 00:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Agent 86. Though the article isn't blatant spam anymore, there's still nothing there that convinces me it even comes close to passing WP:ORG. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.