The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Blatant spam and a coatrack article referenced only to internal documents at an Internet investment firm. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Defined risk strategy[edit]

Unremarkable term, most probably a marketing term for Swan Investing. A search with ABI/Inform shows no academic use of the term (this includes almost all business and economic academic journals since 1971). I cannot understand how it functions based on the article, and the article seems to claim there is a free lunch somewhere in the investment tool, without stating how. All references and external links is solely marketing material made by Swan. Reads like a (well covered) advertisement for Swan. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom LetsdrinkTea 23:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:COAT - spam masquerading as a stub. Bearian (talk) 01:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.