The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 00:21, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DefensAnimal.org[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:GNG, while it's a 10 year old organization, and has a few credits (most likely from publicity seeking gimmicks), the coverage on this organization is rather superficial and not of sufficient coverage. ColonelHenry (talk) 02:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, and the article is furthermore essentially advocacy. DGG ( talk ) 06:37, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I think all these are respetables, but subjective reviews. It's an informative article from an NGO. It doesn’t say something like "DefensAnimal.org is the best NGOs ...", for example, that itself would certainly promo, but it's not the case. Its contains neutral information only.

I don’t know what exactly mean “sufficient coverage”, but I think that it’s a subjective opinion too.

About confusion, the words are common and known on animal rights movement, and they are highlighted to link with its respective articles. --EGAÑA89 (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.