The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deep voices[edit]

Deep voices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable band. Article claims that songs have charted in several different countries, but I have been unable to find evidence of that. No reliable sources provided outside of the interview listed, no in-depth independent coverage found. TNX-Man 19:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Additional references http://www.nickyzimmer.com/artists/03c1989b150dab602/index.html http://www.djmag.com/music/9030 http://www.trance.nu/v4/reviews/kyo-gil-la-ultima http://www.djshog.de/charts/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skillsdj (talkcontribs) 20:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They have had releases on major labels in the electronic music genre. (Trance) I've added additional references for those. They have also recieved airplay (since 2005) on A state of trance Which is hosted by Armin Van Buuren. The archive of playlists can be found here. ASOT These are major accomplishments for this specific genre.

Sorry, I thought I put enough references there for them to be considered to be included on the site per WP:MUSIC.

--Skillsdj (talk) 01:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some from Dj/electronic music magazines:
Dj Mag review 1
Dj Mag review 2
Mixmag 'tune of the month' article copy - I can't seem to pull anything one from mixmag.net since most of their printed articles don't seem to be posted online so it might not be credible enough.

--Skillsdj (talk) 20:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have to be online to cite (although it's nice if it is). You just have to provide all the relevant citation information about the article name, p. number, author, date, source etc. (if I left anything out). ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 08:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StarM 04:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.