The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-27 05:50Z

Davinci sort[edit]

Vanity, original research, not notable. We're in AfD because the author removed the prod tag - using a wikipedia:sock puppet! Potatoswatter 03:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:SOFTWARE (no results in Google News Archive, Google Books, or Google Scholar). --Dhartung | Talk 04:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia is not for stuff you and your friends thought up one day. --Selket ^Talk 04:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Where is notibility shown? All i found was site and some obsurce news group references.--Dacium 06:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and comments above. --Pig^man_{Talk to me} 06:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this isn't actually a sorting algorith contrary to the name, and as software, fails WP:SOFTWARE -- Whpq 17:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete per WP:NFT, WP:VAIN, WP:N, WP:OR, WP:SOFTWARE, WP:SNOW, and, of course, WP:CHEESE. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. (jarbarf) 00:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are plenty of good code repositories for PHP which would be where I would look for an algorithm like this! Mike 15:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with all the above Nevakee11 21:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.