The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David Warrior[edit]

David Warrior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources provided, and I've been unable to find any. There's an OTRS message that I can't repeat, but boils down to saying it is a hoax, something I've been unable to disprove. It's Ticket:2011030210013027 for anyone with OTRS access that wants to take a look. Courcelles 23:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• No idea if any hoax is involved, but ultimately, there's no credible assertion of notability here. Delete Catfish Jim & the soapdish 23:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The guy is real his name is David Wadman, but the information about what he has done is false. Delete —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.172.232.254 (talk) 10:16, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:36, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No sources at all; even the subject's own purported website doesn't appear to exist.--Arxiloxos (talk) 06:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Even if everything in the article is true, it doesn't add up to notability. --MelanieN (talk) 15:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.