The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus. DGG ( talk ) 02:55, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

David Mawuli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with no secondary sources. Sources are all WP:PRIMARY articles by Mawuli, except for one "David Mawuli Named As Official Publicist For Lil Shaker" press release. McGeddon (talk) 12:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A somewhat promotional article on a person without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (The article was largely edited, and may have been created, by an editor with a clear conflict of interest and a history of promotional editing.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's not enough to just mention a wide variety of the man's opinions and who he's been associated with. There seems to be nothing solid here in terms of reliable sources. I don't see a reason to think that he's really notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.