The result of the debate was Keep, even after discounting "votes" by new and anonymous users. Deathphoenix ʕ 13:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Already been through an AFD here back in early 2005, and the result was to redirect to Salad Days Salad Fingers. The article was unredirected and filled out with information and references to blogs and forum posts. I can't find anything in it that is actually encyclopedic. I keep hearing people say he's notable (on AFDs for articles about minor flash animations), but if he is... there must be some source for solid reliable information to fill out a biography article... or this should (at least) just be redirected to Salad Days Salad Fingers again. - Motor (talk) 18:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"maybe just leave in what actually is reliable. there's plenty on there that's obviously uncorroborated speculation and which could reasonably be removed." - guy with no grasp of Wikipedia formatting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.102.48 (talk • contribs) 14:58, June 3, 2006
Keep it - if you had created what this boy has then i'm sure you would want your own page detailing who you are.