The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Denby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:TWODABS. The film critic appears to be the primary topic with thousands more viewing his page, so we can move his article to David Denby after deleting this. I have not found any other mentions that would make this not a TWODAB. (Even if this is kept I strongly believe the critic is the primary topic.) Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 22:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reconfigure per nom. Although I'm not sure, I have my doubts that David Denby (academic) is himself notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: TWODABS is irrelevant, as there is currently not considered to be a primary topic. I suggest that this should have been presented as a Request to Move the film critic to the base name title David Denby - ie to establish him as the Primary Topic. Once this is done, there is then clearly no need for a dab page, per TWODABS. PamD 23:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Denby (surname). They are already listed there. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.