The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:43, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Data Storytelling[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See Wikipedia is not a how-to manual. This doesn't address how the concept is considered notable by reliable sources.

This article needs heavy copy-editing for grammar and style. That isn't a reason to delete, but notability and tone are. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:45, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is why new users need to go through AfC and why WP:ACTRIAL needs to be WP:ACREQ Legacypac (talk) 01:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:57, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. This is nonsense. Natureium (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.