The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 00:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Throne[edit]

Dark Throne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete No verifiable assertions of notability, no reliable sources, No evidence that it passes WP:WEB, previous AfD was a No Consensus train-wreck, no improvements to the article since then have got it up to inclusion standards. DarkSaber2k 08:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. DarkSaber2k 08:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The only independent reference I can find is [1] a mention at orpgames.com, which is pretty flimsy. Perhaps the charity drive appeared in the press? Marasmusine 13:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete this article! It helped a lot! I am begging you! — 72.94.26.62 (talk • contribs) has made no other edits outside this topic.

• Delete No sources, reliable or otherwise, fails WP:WEB now same as it did back then. QuagmireDog 04:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article doesnt indicate why this game is notable. It is odd that it is in beta, yet it has been rewritten and the company has donated money to charities. I'd need to see a lot of reliable sources added before this could be kept. John Vandenberg 10:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Crystal ball (game is in beta), fails WP:N. --User:Krator (t c) 15:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.