The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Matter Moving at the Speed of Light[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or W:NALBUMS (although I appreciate the latter is not terribly prescriptive). Does not appear to have charted anywhere. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Metacritic has a list of reviews from multiple reliable sources including Mojo, Blender, and Pitchfork. There appears to be additional coverage in the Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel. Gong show 08:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Gongshow and WP:BEFORE. --Michig (talk) 08:09, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Gongshow. Meets WP:NALBUMS. — sparklism ^hey! 08:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.