The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TravellingCari 03:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fancruft, non-notable and no sources Macktheknifeau (talk) 03:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per what the nominator said, but look into whether or not the book is notable, perhaps an article on that? The DominatorTalkEdits 04:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete religioncruft. JuJube (talk) 07:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Eight mentions in Factiva for the book (including a couple of reviews), one for "Dark-Day Fatalists" (a reviewer said the Fatalists "allow McGann to examine religion's role in a mechanised, violent, dehumanised world", but that's all that's mentioned), none for "Dark Day Fatalism" or "Dark-Day Fatalism"; therefore it's a non-notable fictional religion. Somno (talk) 10:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hopeless lack of sources. <10 hits on Google outside of Wikipedia, and they appear to be spam. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.