The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 09:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danyadi[edit]

Danyadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article is about a surname, which as the article states, is not very common. Although well-formed, it was not categorized correctly, without stub tag, and originally a dead-end. There are no Wikipedia links to it, nor an article on someone with the name. There are thousand of surnames out there, and not all are notable enough for Wikipedia. Reywas92^{TalkReview me} 20:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Exactly per nom, well presented --Javit 22:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agreed. Not notable. Adrian M. H. 17:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.