The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Soxred 93 13:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Kinahan[edit]

Danny Kinahan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable local councillor and unsuccessful election candidate who fails WP:BIO. Google shows up nothing of note and just being someones son is not enough for notability. Valenciano (talk) 18:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - slightly unfair to nominate for AfD so soon after creation. Hopefully article will be improved. Counter-revolutionary (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which doesn't answer the concerns about the article. What exactly has he done to merit inclusion? There are many antiques experts and many members of borough councils, none of them meet wp:bio based on those factors. Valenciano (talk) 18:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to reply to everything comment made. Let's see what others think. Counter-revolutionary (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I think he is of borderline notability, but there certainly has been coverage independent sources, the fact that the Antrim Times and other local papers aren't online simply makes him a WP:BIO failure on a google test. There is coverage of his work as an antiques consultant and other public appointments[1].Traditional unionist (talk) 19:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Did not get elected for the Northern ireland Assembly. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The council of which he is a member represents a population of only 50,000. Local government bodies of this size do not make the members notable.He lost the last election for MP. There's no real likelihood of finding additional material that would show notability. Coverage has to be significant. DGG (talk) 14:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable failed candidiate who did not win election. Other positions as an antiques consultant, etc. are not sufficient to pass WP:BIO. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 01:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - insufficient evidence of notability. Warofdreams talk 00:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.