The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. لennavecia 15:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Angus[edit]

Danny Angus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable person with no media coverage; fails basic criteria of WP:BIO. Top ghits that presumably relate to this person are self-created home pages and social networking profiles. Article appears to have been self-created as well. Ham Pastrami (talk) 03:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:BIO. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable. Kingturtle (talk) 02:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly not notable, plus the article is only one sentence long.Rcurtis5 (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.