The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. copyvio from http://www.los-angeles-university.com/faculty/#DanielH.

He might be notable, if a proper nonpromotional article were written without copyvio or close paraphrase. DGG ( talk ) 07:29, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Hasidim[edit]

Daniel Hasidim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some notability exists, but on the edge. As far as I see, there are not enough sources to pass WP:GNG Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:27, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete at best as none of this is currently convincing of the needed notability including WP:PROF....Not to mention this is completely unsourced thus PROD applicable. Asking DGG for his analysis. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.