- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 20:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Daniel Genis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability; the only references that aren't by Genis himself are opinion pieces by personal acquaintances. Even if his friends write columns for The New Yorker, they still don't become secondary sources about Genis. My own searches didn't turn up anything useful beyond some local coverage of Genis' arrest in 2003. Huon (talk) 00:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
New article/podcast about Daniel Genis on NPR: http://www.npr.org/2015/03/18/393832866/released-from-prison-apologetic-bandit-writes-about-life-inside Not written by a friend as far as I can tell. Adilawar (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lacks the multiple independent sources we generally require to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 01:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Minimal sourcing, does not feel notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 01:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete Not enough sources to meet WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:16, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.