The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Home and Away characters. BJ^Talk 05:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dani Sutherland[edit]

Dani Sutherland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

might as well toss a few more on the barbie; non-notable fictional character with all the usual fancruft issues. delete. Jack Merridew 08:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 08:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Merge to an appropriate list (there seem to be a few for this show) and delete. Non-notable fictional character.  florrie  15:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and merge isn't an option, is it? Drmies (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment If the character isn't independently notable why not redirect or merge what's worth including to the main article? ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Minor character; no real-world significance. –Moondyne 03:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to an appropriate character list. Edward321 (talk) 13:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per Child and Edward. There seems to be a shred of information worth saving here, and redirects are cheap. Drmies (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Enough notable content to justify its own article, no need to merge it. Dream Focus 18:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are only about 3 lines that are referenced, the rest is plot summary. Anything relevant from the plot summary, save a few few descriptive sentences, should already be in the parent article. Standalone articles are justified by significant coverage in reliable independent sources, not by the volume of content. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 10:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge - Cut the plot summary, merge what's relevant to the appropriate character list. --Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 10:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• merge not appropriate for a separate article, but probably for a merge, and certainly at least for a redirect. No argument has been given against redirect, DGG (talk) 22:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.