The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dancap Productions[edit]

Dancap Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally tagged for CSD under A7, however, I am retracting the tag based on the creator's updates and talk page comments. However, I think this might require wider scrutiny in terms of general notability. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 20:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Easily passes WP:RS and WP:ORG, thanks to a surplus of coverage in the Canadian media: [1]. The article needs better referencing. Warrah (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – The notability seems to be established because it is one of Canada's major corporations. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 04:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.