The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:56, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Nakrosis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The source here is weak. A Google search turns up articles that mention Nakrosis, but no in-depth sources. Nakrosis is trivially mentioned in other Wikipedia article. Alansohn (talk) 01:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Alansohn (talk) 01:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I do not see any SIGCOV in a search. DC Comics has a two word entry for him on their site: "Inker, colorist". Another loss to COVID, sadly.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 16:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Article as it stands makes no claim of notability. Deb (talk) 11:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, expand, flesh out. You don't delete an article just because it isn't filled in, you finish it. That's how Wikis work. His "notability" isn't pigeonholed by random editors' lack of understanding of his field, otherwise we wouldn't have 99 percent of people on this site. The S (talk) 05:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Because neither the creator of this stub nor the writer of the "Keep" opinion immediately above has bothered to demonstrate notability, and various people have credibly said that searches for it were fruitless. You don't create a stub just because you assume that people more energetic than yourself will transform it into something worth reading, you make a real effort yourself before you launch the thing. That's how Wikis work. I shall of course strike out this "delete" !vote if The S applies their enviable understanding of the field to swiftly augmenting the article in such a way that it credibly demonstrates notability. -- Hoary (talk) 01:26, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable cartoonist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SIGCOV. I found a few sources online, but not enough to create a decent stub. Sorry. Bearian (talk) 21:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.