The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DalOUT[edit]

DalOUT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

While certainly an interesting article, the only linsk I can find to it on google are to its website, its parent website, and some blogs. Notability does not jump out, and as LGBT student unions generally aren't notable, I suspect this is the case here. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 17:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nominator. Article seems to fail the organization notability guideline, nor does it really make any claims to pass it. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 17:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete generic student gaysoc. Most proper universities seem to have one these days. Guy (Help!) 19:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.SlideAndSlip 15:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.