The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Antiziganism. Sandstein 07:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dacianos[edit]

Dacianos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN "caste," fails the GNG. Only coverage found (examining the sources in the article included) are casual mentions and namedrops; no significant coverage in reliable sources found. Notability tagged for over a decade. Deprodded without a rationale. Ravenswing 22:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I'd reject either merge option. In the case of Comprachicos, I don't see any connection between the two other than both being somewhat generic groups of alleged child-stealers that Hugo linked in a fictional work. In the case of Romani subgroups, this isn't a real Rom clan -- it's an outright and vicious ethnic slur, somewhat akin to merging "Christ-killers" in with an article/section about Jewish ethnic subgroups. That being said, it remains the case that the subject doesn't have coverage beyond casual mentions and namedrops, and requires deletion per WP:DON'T PRESERVE. Ravenswing 00:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Comprachicos article is probably best as a merge target as there are plenty of sources which associate the names and it says that it's about "several groups". My !vote stands. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can buy that, and good work on the Hugo research; I figured that "Dacianos" was fictional, but didn't look into Comprachicos that deeply. Ravenswing 01:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.