The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DWHS.net[edit]

DWHS.net (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only sources are a weak alexa rating and a single yelp review. I looked and couldn't find additional sources - this article does not meet the general notablity guideline or the guidelines for companies, so it should be deleted. MrOllie (talk) 19:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 12:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

• Delete: the article reads as an advertisement and I see no sources I could use to rewrite it from neutral point of view. The rationales behind WP:B2B, WP:MILL and my WP:NBIZ essays also apply. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The few sources provided in the article, and the ones that I'm finding by seraching elsewhere, pretty much consist solely of press releases or user review sites, neither of which are usable as valid sources to establish notability. Rorshacma (talk) 17:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.