The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 03:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DJM[edit]

DJM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure that the tone of this article nor the amount of sourcing in it really is appropriate. Jasper Deng (talk) 16:47, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep If the tone is bad, change it. If there isn't enough sources, find more. This article is really a stub, which is OK. All articles have to begin somewhere. This seems to be a notable product, I don't think that the underlying argument for this AfD is valid. Roodog2k (talk) 17:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't think that the underlying argument for this AfD is valid. Nail. Hit. Head. I highly doubt this user knows any WP policy TBH. I'll make a note of this when I log a complaint against this individual. Lugnuts (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Neither of the issues in the nom are grounds for deletion. Furthermore, I see no issues with the tone. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:25, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.