The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillization of Esperanto[edit]

Cyrillization of Esperanto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a single reference (with a Cyrillization which differs from that in the article in case of h and ĥ), but hardly notable. Burzuchius (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Esperanto orthography might be a decent ((R from misnomer)) target, but apart from a description of one (unreadable) web page, I can't find any evidence this was ever used by anyone, and sources that I would expect would cover it (such as Ulrich Lins' book "Dangerous Language — Esperanto and the Decline of Stalinism") don't mention the use of Cyrillic script for Esperanto at all. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.