The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:PROF. Mandsford 20:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cyriac Thomas[edit]

Cyriac Thomas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Creator Bobanmathew (talk · contribs) is a single-purpose account, likely in a conflict of interest. Notability is questionable. bender235 (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Firstly I would advise the nominator to start assuming good faith in nomination statements. Secondly the subject clearly passes WP:PROF criterion 6 as a former vice chancellor of a major university. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Phil Bridger (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Phil Bridger (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Phil Bridger Shyamsunder (talk) 09:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 21:28, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.